Thursday, 25 May 2017

Understanding the minds and motivations of the Muslim bombers

I wrote this analysis of Islamic terrorism as a meme-induced mental illness  four years ago.   The situation has continued to deteriorate since then, with the attacks becoming ever more frequent, and the latest one specifically targeting children, leaving little girls killed, maimed, mutilated and disfigured for life, with faces ripped apart by shrapnel deliberately added to the bomb for that purpose.  

Perhaps if we were to reclassify militant Islam from being a religion, to being a contagious form of insanity, we might find better ways of dealing with it.  Maybe if we regarded jihadism as a public health problem, we could use some of the epidemiological approaches to eradicating it that have been so successful against other contagious scourges of humanity, such as smallpox and polio. 

Using the public health analogy, we could employ immunization. We could deliberately spread the metameme (a meme about memes) to give immunity to more pernicious Islamic memes by stimulating critical thinking in Muslims, much like the harmless cowpox virus can block out the lethal smallpox virus by stimulating the immune system.

The mental infection of jihadism is transmitted by a collection of memes (mind-viruses), which when they come together in an organized, mutually-reinforcing system such as Islam are known as a memeplex.  A malignant memeplex takes over the normal mental processes of its host, just like a virus takes over the normal biochemical processes of the body to ensure its own reproduction and spread, even if it means destroying its host in the process.

As Nobel-prize winning author V.S. Naipaul pointed out, hatred of non-Muslims is the pivot of Islamic existence, and this is the central meme around which all the other components of the jihadist memeplex revolve.   The hatred is so psychopathically intense that the host will destroy himself in order to further the purposes of the memes. 

This isn't to say that all Muslims (and especially pseudo-Muslims such as Ahmadiyyas and Sufis) automatically hate us. It's just that 'Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them' is the pivotal commandment of the Koran, with the phrase 'wherever you find them' presumably including children's concerts.    

So the devout Muslim will always have this genocidal commandment ticking away at the back of his mind, ready to explode into Sudden Jihad Syndrome as soon as he becomes mentally unstable.   

For mentally unstable people who have been brought up in Christian, Jewish, Buddhist or Hindu cultures, the internalized commandment 'Thou shalt not kill' may have a restraining influence.    But for the mentally disturbed Muslim, the commandment 'Thou shalt kill!' has the opposite effect. 

From the Buddhist point of view, jihadists such as the Manchester bombers deserve compassion just as much as their victims, for their lives are also being ruined by this contagious viral memeplex of self-reinforcing delusions. A rabid dog suffers from the rabies virus just as much as the people he bites. 

And perhaps Buddhism might offer some hope of treatment for potential jihadists. It may be possible to use Buddhist meditation techniques to cut through delusions and weed out malignant memes even after they have become established ( more here)

And finally, another intellectual weapon against the ideology of jihadism is the theory of evolution itself (from which memetics and the metameme derive).  Islam is incompatible with evolution. If evolution is true then the Koran is false, and consequently all its incitements to violence are revealed as nothing but the rantings and ravings of a psychopath, rather than the commandments of God.   

Of course evolution is no threat to Buddhism, though Darwinism does raise some interesting questions about what experiences our body censors from our mind. 

See also Malignant memes, memeplexes and the metameme.


Anonymous said...

Q: What's the difference between Mohammed and Hitler?
A: Hitler didn't rape nine year old girls.

Anonymous said...

Q: What's the difference between Jesus and Mohamed?
A: Jesus said 'Suffer little children to come unto me'
Mohamed said 'You'll suffer, little children, when I cum into you!'

seanrobsville said...

@ Anon. Regarding the character of the 'prophet', we kuffars are always being told to respect Islam and its founder. But why should we respect a cult that is an obvious scam set up by a child-molesting confidence trickster and gangster, and whose primary objective is our extermination or subjugation?

To treat Islam with anything other than the utter contempt and derision it has so copiously earned is simply suicidal.

If kuffars made it clear that we regard Islam as a bogus cult, then Muslims themselves may begin to see through the confidence trick. I don't expect a sudden 'Emperor's New Clothes' awakening throughout the Ummah, but a gradual attrition may eventually do the job, as it has with the left's campaign against Christianity in Britain.

However, such a campaign cannot be successful while being a Muslim allows them any advantanges in the West, such as immunity from prosecution for child prostitution, the ability to sue kuffars for Islamophobia at the slightest pretext, and generally getting away with bullying and intimidating the rest of the population while claiming victimhood.

There is also the obstacle of cultural inertia. It must be difficult to come to terms with the fact that not only you, but also all your ancestors have been gulled by a scam which has left your societies backward, illiterate and anarchic. But as the consequences of Islam become ever more blatantly obvious, it will be increasingly difficult to stay in denial.

Islam can be cured!